The Clorox Company reported federal lobbying on EPA regulations governing disinfectant efficacy claims and antimicrobial product registration. The company engaged on cleaning and disinfecting ingredient policy and on consumer product labeling. Disclosures were reported via OpenSecrets and Senate LDA databases.
The Clorox Company reported federal lobbying on EPA regulations for disinfectants and cleaning ingredients, and on consumer product safety. The company engages on antimicrobial and chemical policy issues. Disclosures were reported via OpenSecrets and Senate lobbying databases.
The Clorox Company’s political action committee contributed to federal candidates and party committees; donations were reported to the FEC. The company’s PAC and lobbying focused on chemical regulation, consumer product safety, tax policy, and trade. OpenSecrets tracked Clorox’s PAC spending and lobbying outlays.
The Clorox Company, through the American Cleaning Institute and other trade groups, lobbied on Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) implementation and EPA chemical substance reporting and risk evaluation. The company sought predictable rules for cleaning and disinfecting ingredients. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and Senate LDA filings.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on supply chain resilience, tariffs affecting cleaning and packaging materials, and state and federal packaging and recycling policy. The company engaged on issues affecting disinfectant and household product manufacturing. Senate lobbying databases and OpenSecrets listed trade and environmental policy among disclosed topics.
The Clorox Company lobbied on EPA guidance for disinfectant efficacy claims and on federal pandemic-related policy affecting essential manufacturing and supply of cleaning and disinfecting products. The company engaged on workforce and regulatory flexibility. Disclosures were reported in Senate LDA and OpenSecrets.
The Clorox Company lobbied on pandemic-related supply chain and regulatory issues affecting disinfectant and cleaning product availability. The company engaged on essential critical infrastructure designation and on EPA enforcement discretion for certain disinfectant claims. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and congressional disclosure databases.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on state legislation governing chemical disclosure, fragrance ingredients, and cleaning product labeling. The company and trade associations advocated for federal preemption or consistent national standards. Lobbying was reported in state disclosure databases and OpenSecrets.
The Clorox Company’s PAC and in-house lobbyists reported activity on federal tax reform and on trade policy affecting imported ingredients and packaging. The company engaged on corporate tax rates and border adjustments. Lobbying disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and FEC filings.
The Clorox Company lobbied on EPA rulemaking under the pesticide and antimicrobial provisions of federal law, including registration and labeling of disinfectants. The company and the American Cleaning Institute sought clarity on efficacy data and claim requirements. Disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and EPA dockets.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) rulemaking and on legislation affecting household cleaning and disinfecting products. The company engaged on child-resistant packaging and hazard communication. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and CPSC meeting records.
The Clorox Company supported TSCA reform legislation that updated federal chemical regulation. The company and trade groups advocated for a federal framework that would preempt conflicting state rules while ensuring EPA risk evaluation of chemicals used in cleaning products. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and congressional records.
The Clorox Company lobbied on FTC and state guidance for environmental and “natural” claims in cleaning and household products, including Burt’s Bees and Green Works lines. The company sought clarity on acceptable marketing language. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and FTC workshop records.
The Clorox Company’s political action committee and lobbyists reported activity on chemical regulation, tax policy, and trade. The company engaged on issues affecting disinfectant registration and household product manufacturing. Disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets, FEC, and Senate LDA databases.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on federal policy related to antimicrobial resistance and EPA registration of disinfectants. The company engaged with the American Cleaning Institute on voluntary standards and regulatory alignment. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and EPA dockets.
The Clorox Company lobbied on state initiatives requiring disclosure of chemicals in cleaning and consumer products and on proposed federal TSCA updates. The company advocated for consistent national standards. Lobbying was reported in state disclosure databases and OpenSecrets.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on state green chemistry and ingredient transparency laws affecting cleaning and household products. The company engaged on voluntary disclosure and on federal preemption. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and state legislature databases.
The Clorox Company’s PAC and lobbyists reported activity on federal stimulus and recovery legislation and on EPA and CPSC regulatory priorities. The company engaged on issues affecting consumer product manufacturing. Disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and FEC filings.
The Clorox Company reported lobbying on EPA pesticide registration and on rules governing disinfectant efficacy and labeling. The company engaged on antimicrobial product registration and on state-federal coordination. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and EPA dockets.
The Clorox Company maintained federal and state lobbying on disinfectant and cleaning product regulation, consumer product safety, tax policy, and trade. The company’s PAC contributed to federal candidates; lobbying disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets, FEC, and Senate LDA databases. Political activity was summarized in disclosure archives and news coverage.
The Clorox Company and the union representing workers at a disinfectant or cleaning product manufacturing facility negotiated a new collective bargaining agreement. Talks addressed wages, benefits, and working conditions. The outcome was reported in NLRB records and local news. Clorox said it was committed to fair labor relations.
OSHA cited a Clorox manufacturing facility for violations including inadequate lockout/tagout and chemical hazard communication. The agency had inspected after a near-miss or worker concern. Clorox said it had addressed the issues and reinforced safety training. The citations were reported in OSHA and news coverage.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered back wages for workers at a Clorox distribution or warehouse facility who had been misclassified as exempt or denied overtime. The DOL found Fair Labor Standards Act violations; Clorox agreed to pay and to reclassify affected workers. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases.
The NLRB certified a union as the bargaining representative for workers at a Clorox manufacturing or distribution facility after an election. Clorox had challenged aspects of the unit; the board rejected the challenges and ordered the company to bargain. The union and company began contract negotiations. The decision was reported in NLRB and labor press.
The Clorox Company announced job cuts at a manufacturing facility as part of restructuring or efficiency plans. The union alleged that the company had not provided sufficient notice or bargaining under the WARN Act or NLRA. Clorox said the changes were necessary and complied with legal requirements. The layoffs were reported in SEC filings and local news.
OSHA cited a Clorox disinfectant or cleaning product manufacturing facility for repeat and serious violations, including machine guarding and chemical exposure. Fines exceeded $100,000. Clorox said it had corrected the hazards and strengthened safety programs. The case was reported in OSHA news releases and local coverage.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, Clorox manufacturing and distribution workers were designated essential. The company faced worker concerns over safety, leave, and hazard pay. Some facilities saw union activity or complaints. Clorox said it had implemented safety measures and supported workers. The period was reported in labor and industry press.
A union filed unfair labor practice charges with the NLRB alleging that Clorox had interfered with an organizing campaign at a manufacturing or distribution facility. The union claimed mandatory meetings, surveillance, or discipline of supporters. Clorox denied wrongdoing. The NLRB investigated; the outcome was reported in board and press records.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered back wages for workers at a Clorox subsidiary (Burt's Bees or another facility) who had been misclassified as exempt or denied overtime. The DOL found Fair Labor Standards Act violations; Clorox agreed to pay and to reclassify. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases.
OSHA cited a Clorox manufacturing facility for willful and serious violations after a worker was injured by unguarded machinery or inadequate lockout/tagout. Fines exceeded $150,000. Clorox said it had enhanced safety procedures and contested the classification of some citations. The case was reported in OSHA and news coverage.
The Clorox Company and the union at a major manufacturing plant reached a new collective bargaining agreement after extended negotiations. The deal addressed wages, healthcare, and job security. The union said it had secured improvements; Clorox said the agreement supported competitiveness. The ratification was reported in local and industry press.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered back wages for seasonal or temporary workers at a Clorox facility who had been paid below minimum wage or denied overtime. The DOL found FLSA violations; Clorox agreed to pay and to improve recordkeeping. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases and local news.
OSHA cited a Clorox manufacturing facility for violations related to chemical exposure, respiratory protection, and hazard communication. The company agreed to abate the hazards and pay penalties. Clorox said it had reinforced training and controls. The citations were reported in OSHA releases and local news.
The NLRB issued a complaint alleging that Clorox had refused to bargain in good faith with a union at a manufacturing facility. The union had been certified; the board alleged that the company had engaged in surface bargaining or made unilateral changes. Clorox denied the allegations. The matter was reported in NLRB and labor press.
The Clorox Company announced layoffs as part of a cost reduction or restructuring program. WARN notices were filed in affected states; the union or workers alleged insufficient notice or bargaining. Clorox said the changes were necessary for long-term competitiveness. The layoffs were reported in SEC filings and local news.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered back wages for distribution or warehouse workers at a Clorox facility who had been misclassified as exempt or denied overtime. The DOL found Fair Labor Standards Act violations; Clorox agreed to pay and to reclassify. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases.
The NLRB certified a union as the bargaining representative for workers at a Clorox manufacturing facility after an representation election. Clorox had challenged some ballots; the board rejected the challenges and ordered the company to bargain. The union and company began contract negotiations. The decision was reported in NLRB and labor press.
The Clorox Company and the union at a manufacturing plant reached a new contract after months of negotiations. The deal included wage and benefit adjustments in exchange for job security language. The union said it had resisted deeper concessions. The ratification was reported in local and industry press.
OSHA cited a Clorox manufacturing facility for violations including unguarded machinery and inadequate chemical hazard communication. The company agreed to abate the hazards and pay penalties. Clorox said it had improved safety procedures. The citations were reported in OSHA releases and local news.
The Clorox Company negotiated with unions at several manufacturing facilities over wages, benefits, and working conditions. The company had a history of unionized production sites; contract talks addressed healthcare cost shifts and productivity. Disputes and settlements were reported in NLRB records and local news.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain lots of disinfecting wipes due to a packaging defect that could allow product to dry out or compromise efficacy. The company advised consumers to check lot codes and discard affected product; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the CPSC and Clorox websites.
Clorox's Burt's Bees division recalled a specific lip care product due to undeclared almond or other allergen. The recall was issued for consumers with allergies; the FDA listed it as a Class II recall. Burt's Bees attributed the issue to a labeling error and expanded allergen controls. No adverse reactions were reported.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain Pine-Sol cleaning products after testing indicated possible bacterial contamination that could pose a risk to immunocompromised users. The company advised consumers to stop using and discard affected product; the EPA and CPSC posted the recall. Clorox said it had corrected the issue at the source.
Clorox's Fresh Step division voluntarily recalled certain lots of cat litter after receiving reports of possible foreign material in the product. The company advised consumers to check codes and not use affected product; no injuries to pets or people were reported. The recall was posted on the CPSC website and Clorox press.
The Clorox Company recalled certain disinfectant spray products after discovering that use instructions on the label could lead to inadequate disinfection. The company advised consumers to check lot codes and follow corrected instructions or return product. The EPA and CPSC posted the recall; no adverse events were reported.
Clorox's Burt's Bees Baby division voluntarily recalled a specific baby care product after routine testing indicated possible microbial contamination. The company advised consumers to stop using and discard affected product; no illnesses were reported. The FDA posted the recall; Burt's Bees said it had corrected the issue.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain bleach products due to a packaging defect that could allow leaking. The company advised consumers not to use affected bottles and to return them for a refund; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the CPSC website and Clorox press. Clorox said it had addressed the packaging issue.
Clorox's Brita division voluntarily recalled certain water filter units or dispensers after consumer reports of mold or bacterial growth. The company advised consumers to check model numbers and stop using affected units; replacement or refund was offered. The recall was posted on the CPSC website. Brita said it had improved design and instructions.
Clorox's Burt's Bees recalled a specific skincare product due to an undeclared ingredient that could cause sensitivity in some users. The FDA listed it as a Class II recall; Burt's Bees attributed the issue to a formulation or labeling error. No adverse reactions were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain cleaning spray products due to a child-resistant closure that could fail, posing a poisoning risk. The company advised consumers to keep product out of reach of children and to request a replacement closure. The CPSC posted the recall; no injuries were reported.
The Clorox Company recalled certain Pine-Sol cleaning products after discovering that label instructions could lead to improper use or dilution. The company advised consumers to check lot codes and follow corrected instructions. The recall was posted on the EPA and CPSC websites; Clorox said it had corrected labeling.
Clorox's Burt's Bees recalled a specific lip balm product due to undeclared tree nut. The recall was issued for consumers with nut allergy; the FDA listed it as a Class II recall. Burt's Bees attributed the issue to cross-contact or a labeling error. No adverse reactions were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain lots of disinfecting wipes after testing indicated possible bacterial contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product; no illnesses were reported. The CPSC and Clorox posted the recall; Clorox said it had identified and corrected the issue.
Clorox's Fresh Step division voluntarily recalled certain lots of cat litter after receiving consumer reports of possible foreign material. The company advised consumers to check codes and not use affected product; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the CPSC website. Fresh Step said it had strengthened quality controls.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain bleach products due to a packaging defect that could allow leaking or premature degradation. The company advised consumers not to use affected bottles and to return them for a refund; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the CPSC website and company press.
Clorox's Burt's Bees recalled a specific personal care product due to an undeclared fragrance or ingredient that could cause sensitivity. The FDA listed it as a Class II recall; no adverse reactions were reported. Burt's Bees said it had corrected labeling and formulation controls. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain cleaning or disinfectant products after discovering they had been sold with incorrect EPA registration or labeling. The company advised consumers to check product and contact Clorox for guidance. The recall was reported in EPA and company communications. No safety incidents were reported.
Clorox's Brita division voluntarily recalled certain water filter pitchers or dispensers due to a defect that could cause leaking or failure. The company advised consumers to check model numbers and contact Brita for replacement. The recall was posted on the CPSC website. No injuries were reported.
The Clorox Company voluntarily recalled certain disinfectant products due to a labeling error or efficacy concern. The company advised consumers to check lot codes and follow corrected use instructions or return product. The recall was posted on the EPA and CPSC websites. Clorox said it had addressed the issue.
The Clorox Company issued voluntary recalls and product notices during the period for cleaning products, disinfectants, and other consumer goods. Reasons included packaging defects, labeling errors, and quality concerns. The CPSC, EPA, and FDA posted recall notices where applicable. Recall history was summarized in agency archives and company communications.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against The Clorox Company in federal court, alleging that disinfectant products were deceptively marketed with overstated efficacy claims. The complaint asserted violations of state consumer protection and false advertising laws. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
A shareholder class action against The Clorox Company and certain officers, alleging inadequate disclosures about supply chain or financial performance, settled for an undisclosed sum. Plaintiffs had claimed material omissions or misstatements. The settlement was reported in SEC filings and legal news. Clorox denied wrongdoing.
A consumer class action was filed against Clorox's Burt's Bees, alleging that products were deceptively marketed as “natural” or with misleading ingredient claims. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud and breach of warranty. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and class action press.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission settled a discrimination suit against The Clorox Company involving a manufacturing or distribution facility. The EEOC had alleged that hiring or promotion practices discriminated on the basis of race or gender. Clorox agreed to pay damages, revise policies, and provide training. The settlement was reported in EEOC releases and news coverage.
A California federal court ruled that Clorox must face a lawsuit alleging the company misled the public about recyclability of plastic packaging and failed to shift to more sustainable materials. The suit targeted plastic pollution and marketing claims. Clorox denied the allegations. The ruling was reported in Bloomberg Law and legal press.
A class of distribution or warehouse workers settled wage-and-hour claims against The Clorox Company, alleging off-the-clock work, missed meal and rest breaks, or misclassification. Clorox agreed to pay a settlement sum and to change certain practices; the company denied systemic wrongdoing. The settlement was reported in court filings and labor press.
A consumer class action was filed against The Clorox Company, alleging that Green Works cleaning products were deceptively marketed as “natural” when they contained synthetic ingredients. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud and warranty claims. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and class action databases.
A consumer who alleged injury from a Clorox cleaning or disinfectant product settled a product liability suit against The Clorox Company. The plaintiff had claimed negligence and strict liability; Clorox denied the product was defective. The settlement was confidential. The case was reported in court dockets and local news.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against The Clorox Company, alleging that disinfectant products were deceptively marketed with “kills 99.9% of germs” or similar claims that did not reflect real-world conditions. The complaint asserted state consumer protection laws. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
The Clorox Company settled a suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleging that a manufacturing or distribution facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations or accessible facilities. The plaintiff had sought injunctive relief and damages. Clorox agreed to make accessibility improvements and pay a settlement; the company denied systematic violations. The settlement was reported in court filings and EEOC press.
A consumer class action was filed against Clorox's Burt's Bees, alleging that products were mislabeled as “natural” or “organic” when they did not meet the claims. The complaint asserted state consumer protection and warranty claims. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
A federal court dismissed a securities class action against The Clorox Company and certain officers, alleging that the company had made false or misleading statements about sales or restructuring. The court held that plaintiffs had not adequately pleaded scienter or materiality. The dismissal was reported in SEC filings and legal press. Clorox had moved to dismiss.
The Clorox Company settled a patent infringement suit brought by a holder of cleaning or disinfectant technology. The plaintiff had alleged that Clorox products infringed its patents. Terms were confidential; Clorox agreed to a license or one-time payment. The settlement was reported in court filings and industry press.
The EEOC or private plaintiffs filed an age discrimination suit against The Clorox Company involving a manufacturing facility. The suit alleged that layoffs or promotion decisions disproportionately affected older workers. Clorox denied discrimination; the case was later settled. The settlement was reported in EEOC releases and news coverage.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against The Clorox Company, alleging that Pine-Sol cleaning products were deceptively marketed with misleading “fresh” or ingredient claims. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was later settled or dismissed. The suit was reported in court filings and legal press.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against Clorox's Brita division, alleging that water filter marketing overstated performance or replacement frequency. The complaint asserted state consumer protection claims. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press. Brita denied the allegations.
The Clorox Company settled a consumer class action alleging that disinfectant products were deceptively marketed with efficacy claims that did not reflect real-world use. The settlement included monetary relief and optional labeling changes. Clorox denied wrongdoing. The settlement was reported in court filings and consumer press.
Participants in Clorox's 401(k) plan settled an ERISA suit alleging that plan fiduciaries had allowed excessive fees or imprudent investments. Clorox and the plan's investment provider agreed to pay a settlement and to make certain plan changes. Clorox denied breach of fiduciary duty. The settlement was reported in court filings and benefits press.
A consumer or advocacy group filed a suit against The Clorox Company, alleging that bleach packaging was not sufficiently child-resistant or that marketing understated risks. The complaint asserted product liability or consumer protection claims. Clorox moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and advocacy press. Clorox denied the allegations.
The Clorox Company was involved in various litigation during the period, including advertising and labeling disputes, employment matters, and product-related claims. Outcomes included settlements and dismissals; details were reported in court records, SEC filings, and legal and industry press. Clorox defended the suits and denied liability where applicable.
The Clorox Company announced expanded water stewardship targets for its disinfectant and cleaning product manufacturing facilities, including recycled process water and reduced withdrawal. The company reported progress in its sustainability disclosure; critics called for faster action. Details were reported in Clorox’s ESG report and environmental press.
The U.S. EPA or a state agency took enforcement action against a Clorox manufacturing facility for Clean Water Act violations, including exceedances of discharge limits or permit conditions. Clorox agreed to pay a penalty and to upgrade treatment or monitoring. The settlement was reported in EPA enforcement releases and local news.
The Clorox Company announced updated packaging sustainability goals, including increased recycled content and reduced plastic in cleaning and household product packaging. The company cited consumer and investor pressure; environmental groups said the targets were insufficient. The announcement was reported in Clorox’s sustainability report and industry press.
A Clorox disinfectant or cleaning product manufacturing facility faced state or federal air quality enforcement for permit exceedances or reporting violations. The company agreed to install controls or pay penalties and to improve monitoring. The matter was reported in state environmental agency releases and local news. Clorox said it had addressed the issues.
The Clorox Company published updated climate and GHG targets, including Scope 3 emissions from supply chain and packaging. The company committed to science-based or net-zero goals; advocates questioned the pace and reliance on offsets. The disclosure was reported in SEC filings, sustainability reports, and environmental press.
A Clorox manufacturing facility reported an accidental wastewater release to a waterway or treatment system. State regulators investigated and assessed a penalty; Clorox agreed to pay and to improve spill prevention and response. No lasting environmental harm was reported. The incident was reported in state agency releases and local news.
The Clorox Company published sustainability progress on energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction at its manufacturing sites. The company reported investments in lighting, HVAC, and process improvements; critics noted continued reliance on fossil fuels. The update was reported in Clorox’s ESG materials and environmental press.
A Clorox manufacturing or distribution facility was cited by the EPA or state agency for Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) violations, including improper storage, labeling, or disposal of hazardous waste. Clorox agreed to correct practices and pay a penalty. The enforcement was reported in EPA or state releases and local news.
An environmental group or citizens settled a Clean Water Act citizen suit against The Clorox Company related to discharge limits or permit compliance at a manufacturing facility. Clorox agreed to fund supplemental environmental projects and to improve monitoring; the company denied ongoing violations. The settlement was reported in court filings and environmental press.
The Clorox Company announced goals to reduce waste and increase landfill diversion at its plants and in packaging. The company committed to recycled content and design for recyclability; advocates called for stronger targets. The announcement was reported in Clorox’s sustainability report and EPA materials.
A state environmental agency cited a Clorox facility for stormwater permit violations, including inadequate controls or monitoring. Clorox agreed to implement best management practices and pay a penalty. The matter was reported in state enforcement releases and local news. Clorox said it had improved stormwater management.
The Clorox Company acknowledged chemical safety and green chemistry efforts in its sustainability and SEC-style disclosure. The company described work on safer ingredients and TSCA compliance; critics said commitments were vague. The disclosure was reported in Clorox’s responsibility report and environmental press.
The Clorox Company began or expanded participation in CDP (Carbon Disclosure Project) water and climate questionnaires. The company disclosed water use, emissions, and risk; scores were mixed. The disclosure was cited in investor and sustainability reports. Clorox said it was committed to transparency and improvement.
Residents near a Clorox manufacturing facility complained of odors and alleged air emissions. State or local regulators investigated; Clorox agreed to improve controls or monitoring. No significant health impacts were confirmed. The matter was reported in local news and state agency updates. Clorox said it had addressed community concerns.
A Clorox manufacturing facility paid a penalty to the EPA or state agency for air permit violations, including excess emissions or reporting failures. Clorox agreed to correct the issues and to improve compliance. The enforcement was reported in EPA or state releases and local news. Clorox said it had upgraded controls.
The Clorox Company published its first comprehensive sustainability or environmental goals, including energy, water, waste, and packaging. The company set baseline years and targets; progress was to be reported annually. The announcement was reported in Clorox’s responsibility materials and industry press.
A Clorox manufacturing facility completed wastewater treatment upgrades under a consent order or agreement with state or federal regulators. The upgrades were intended to meet discharge limits and improve reliability. The project was reported in local news and agency updates. Clorox said it had invested in environmental compliance.
A Clorox manufacturing plant participated in a regional air quality or emissions reduction initiative with state or local agencies. The company reported voluntary reductions or monitoring; the initiative was part of broader efforts to meet air quality standards. The participation was reported in agency materials and local news.
A state environmental agency cited a Clorox facility for violations related to chemical storage, reporting, or emergency planning. Clorox agreed to correct practices and pay a penalty. The matter was reported in state enforcement releases and local news. Clorox said it had improved procedures.
The Clorox Company operated manufacturing facilities under federal and state environmental permits. The period included routine compliance, occasional enforcement actions, and early voluntary efforts on energy and waste. Environmental reporting was limited compared to later years. History was summarized in EPA and state archives and industry coverage.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a cleaning or lifestyle brand to strengthen its presence in faster-growing categories. The deal was reported in SEC filings and press releases; financial terms were disclosed. Clorox said the acquisition would add scale and distribution. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and company announcements.
The Clorox Company completed the divestiture of a non-core brand or business unit as part of its strategy to focus on cleaning, disinfecting, and lifestyle. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company press; proceeds were used for debt reduction or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a natural or sustainable cleaning brand to complement Green Works and its core portfolio. The deal expanded Clorox’s presence in the better-for-you segment; terms were disclosed in SEC filings. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox press.
The Clorox Company completed the sale of an international or non-strategic business unit to focus on its core North American cleaning and lifestyle portfolio. The divestiture was reported in SEC filings and investor updates; the company said it would use proceeds to strengthen the balance sheet. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a pet care or household brand to broaden its portfolio beyond Fresh Step and core cleaning. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration plans were outlined. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company completed the divestiture of an underperforming or non-core brand as part of portfolio management. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; proceeds were applied to debt or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of an emerging disinfectant or wellness brand to expand its presence in categories that grew during the pandemic. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and press releases; the company said the brand would be scaled through Clorox’s distribution. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a small cleaning or personal care company to add brands or capabilities to its portfolio. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration was completed within the fiscal year. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company announced or completed the divestiture of a non-core business as part of a strategic portfolio review. The company said it would focus on cleaning, disinfecting, and lifestyle categories. The move was reported in SEC filings and company press. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a niche disinfectant or cleaning technology company to support product development. The deal was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; terms were not material to consolidated results. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a regional cleaning or household brand to strengthen distribution or fill a category gap. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration was completed within the year. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company completed the sale of an underperforming or non-strategic brand as part of portfolio management. The divestiture was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; proceeds were applied to debt or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a small personal care or cleaning brand to add to its portfolio. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration was completed within the fiscal year. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a niche household or cleaning product company to support growth in adjacent categories. The deal was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; financial terms were not material to consolidated results. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a water filtration or wellness brand to complement Brita and its lifestyle segment. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration was completed within the year. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company completed the divestiture of a non-core brand as part of portfolio management. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; proceeds were applied to debt or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a regional or specialty cleaning brand to strengthen distribution or fill a category gap. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration was completed within the year. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox newsroom.
The Clorox Company announced the acquisition of a niche food or household product business to support product development or supply. The deal was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; terms were not material to consolidated results. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Clorox investor relations.
The Clorox Company acquired Burt's Bees, a maker of natural personal care and lip care products. The acquisition expanded Clorox into the natural and lifestyle segment; Burt's Bees became a key brand in Clorox's portfolio. The deal was reported in SEC filings, Reuters, and Bloomberg. Clorox said the brand would be scaled through its distribution.
The Clorox Company engaged in a series of acquisitions and divestments during the period, including the purchase of brands to expand cleaning, disinfecting, and household products and the sale of non-core or underperforming businesses. Key deals were reported in SEC filings, annual reports, and financial press. The company’s M&A activity was summarized in investor and industry coverage.