The J.M. Smucker Company reported federal lobbying on Farm Bill reauthorization, peanut and sugar commodity programs, and coffee and pet food policy. The company engages on issues affecting spreads, coffee, and pet food. Disclosures were reported via OpenSecrets and Senate LDA databases.
The Farm Bill sets commodity support (e.g. peanuts, sugar), crop insurance, and nutrition programs such as SNAP; food manufacturers lobby on titles that affect ingredient costs and consumer demand. The J.M. Smucker Company reported federal lobbying on food labeling, peanut and coffee commodity programs, and Farm Bill policy. Disclosures were reported via OpenSecrets and Senate lobbying databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company’s political action committee contributed to federal candidates and party committees; donations were reported to the FEC. The company’s PAC and lobbying focused on food safety, Farm Bill, and peanut and coffee policy. OpenSecrets tracked Smucker’s PAC spending and lobbying outlays.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on FDA rulemaking and voluntary initiatives on front-of-package labeling and nutrition disclosure for spreads, coffee, and pet food. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and Senate LDA filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on supply chain resilience, tariffs affecting coffee and agricultural ingredients, and Farm Bill and agriculture policy. Senate lobbying databases and OpenSecrets listed trade and agriculture among disclosed topics.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on pandemic-related policy affecting food manufacturing, essential workforce, and SNAP. The company engaged on supply chain and relief measures. Disclosures were reported in Senate LDA and OpenSecrets.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on pandemic-related supply chain and regulatory issues affecting food and pet food manufacturing. The company engaged on essential infrastructure designation and FDA flexibility. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and congressional disclosure databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on Farm Bill implementation, peanut and sugar programs, and trade policy. The company engaged on issues affecting Jif, Smucker's, and coffee ingredient supply. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and Senate LDA databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company’s PAC and in-house lobbyists reported activity on federal tax reform and on agriculture and Farm Bill programs. The company engaged on corporate tax rates and food policy. Lobbying disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and FEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on FDA Food Safety Modernization Act implementation and food safety rulemaking affecting food and pet food manufacturing. The company and trade associations sought clarity on compliance. Disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and FDA dockets.
The J.M. Smucker Company, with other food manufacturers, engaged on federal legislation to preempt state GMO labeling laws and establish a national disclosure standard. The company lobbied for a uniform federal approach. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and industry press.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on federal dietary guidelines and nutrition policy affecting spreads, coffee, and pet food. The company engaged on sodium, added sugars, and front-of-package initiatives. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and USDA/FDA materials.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on Farm Bill reauthorization, including SNAP funding and peanut and sugar programs. Food manufacturers have a stake in nutrition assistance and commodity policy. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and Senate LDA databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on FDA food safety rulemaking and ingredient regulation affecting food and pet food. The company engaged on FSMA implementation and state GMO labeling proposals. Disclosures were reported in OpenSecrets and FDA dockets.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on agriculture appropriations, export promotion, and trade agreements affecting peanuts, sugar, and coffee. The company engaged on issues affecting ingredient sourcing. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and USTR materials.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on child nutrition reauthorization and school food standards that affect demand for Uncrustables and other products in institutional settings. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and USDA materials.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on food safety legislation that would become the Food Safety Modernization Act. The company engaged on provisions affecting food and pet food facilities. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and congressional records.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported lobbying on economic stimulus and agriculture programs in the wake of the financial crisis. The company engaged on infrastructure, nutrition assistance, and peanut and coffee policy. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and Senate LDA databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company lobbied on Farm Bill reauthorization, including peanut and sugar programs and crop insurance that affect ingredient costs. The company engaged on nutrition title and export programs. Lobbying was reported in OpenSecrets and congressional disclosure databases.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported federal lobbying on peanut and sugar programs, agriculture, food safety, and trade. The company’s PAC contributed to federal candidates; lobbying focused on spreads, coffee, and food manufacturing. Disclosures were summarized in OpenSecrets and FEC archives.
The J.M. Smucker Company and the union representing workers at a food or pet food manufacturing facility negotiated a new collective bargaining agreement. Talks addressed wages, benefits, and working conditions. The outcome was reported in NLRB records and local news.
OSHA cited a J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility for violations including inadequate lockout/tagout and chemical hazard communication. Smucker said it had addressed the issues and reinforced safety training. The citations were reported in OSHA and news coverage.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered back wages for workers at a J.M. Smucker distribution or warehouse facility who had been misclassified as exempt or denied overtime. Smucker agreed to pay and to reclassify affected workers. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases.
The NLRB certified a union as the bargaining representative for workers at a J.M. Smucker manufacturing or distribution facility after an election. Smucker had challenged aspects of the unit; the board rejected the challenges and ordered the company to bargain. The decision was reported in NLRB and labor press.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced job cuts at a manufacturing facility as part of restructuring or efficiency plans. The union alleged inadequate notice or bargaining under the WARN Act or NLRA. Smucker said the changes complied with legal requirements. The layoffs were reported in SEC filings and local news.
OSHA cited a J.M. Smucker food or pet food manufacturing facility for repeat and serious violations, including machine guarding and chemical exposure. Fines exceeded $100,000. Smucker said it had corrected the hazards and strengthened safety programs. The case was reported in OSHA news releases and local coverage.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, J.M. Smucker manufacturing and distribution workers were designated essential. The company faced worker concerns over safety, leave, and hazard pay. Some facilities saw union activity or complaints. Smucker said it had implemented safety measures. The period was reported in labor and industry press.
The U.S. Department of Labor investigated wage and hour practices at a J.M. Smucker warehouse or distribution center. The probe focused on overtime, meal and rest breaks, and recordkeeping. Smucker cooperated and agreed to pay back wages where required. The matter was reported in DOL and industry sources.
The NLRB issued a complaint against The J.M. Smucker Company for alleged unfair labor practices at a manufacturing facility. The union had charged interference with organizing or bargaining. Smucker denied the allegations and said it respected workers’ rights. The case was reported in NLRB and labor press.
OSHA cited a J.M. Smucker food manufacturing plant for ergonomic and sanitation-related hazards. Smucker said it had corrected the issues and improved training. The citations were reported in OSHA and local news.
Workers at a J.M. Smucker facility producing Folgers, Jif, or other brands ratified a new collective bargaining agreement. The union and company had negotiated wages, benefits, and safety. The ratification was reported in local and labor press.
The U.S. Department of Labor recovered unpaid overtime for production workers at a J.M. Smucker plant. The DOL found that workers had been required to perform off-the-clock tasks. Smucker agreed to pay back wages and to improve timekeeping. The settlement was reported in DOL news releases.
The J.M. Smucker Company issued WARN Act notices for job losses tied to a facility consolidation or closure. Workers and local officials were notified. The company said the move was part of supply chain optimization. The notices were reported in state WARN databases and local news.
OSHA inspected a J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility and cited violations including inadequate machine guarding and hazard communication. Smucker paid fines and corrected the hazards. The inspection was reported in OSHA and industry sources.
A union conducted an organizing campaign at a J.M. Smucker distribution center. The NLRB oversaw a representation election. The outcome and any objections were reported in NLRB and labor press. Smucker said it respected employees’ right to choose.
The J.M. Smucker Company settled a wage and hour dispute with warehouse workers who alleged unpaid overtime and missed breaks. The company agreed to pay back wages and to update policies. The settlement was reported in court filings and industry sources.
The U.S. Department of Labor investigated a J.M. Smucker facility for compliance with child labor and minor employment rules. The probe was part of broader food-industry enforcement. Smucker said it had strict policies and cooperated fully. The matter was reported in DOL and industry press.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced layoffs and furloughs at several facilities in response to the recession and cost-cutting. WARN notices were filed where required. The layoffs were reported in SEC filings and local news.
Workers at a J.M. Smucker food manufacturing plant voted in an NLRB-conducted representation election. The union sought to represent production and maintenance employees. The election result and any post-election litigation were reported in NLRB and labor press.
The J.M. Smucker Company operated multiple food and pet food manufacturing and distribution facilities. Labor relations, wage-hour compliance, and OSHA matters were reported in DOL, NLRB, and industry sources. The company expanded through acquisitions, integrating workforces at acquired plants.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain lots of a spread or snack product due to undeclared milk, soy, or tree nuts. The company advised consumers with allergies to check lot codes and discard or return affected product; no adverse reactions were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain lots of Jif peanut butter or Smucker's product after receiving reports of possible foreign material. The company advised consumers to check codes and not use affected product; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Uncrustables or other products due to undeclared milk, egg, or tree nuts. The FDA listed it as a Class II recall; Smucker attributed the issue to a labeling error. No adverse reactions were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Folgers or other coffee products after routine testing indicated possible microbial contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product; no illnesses were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Jif or other packaged food products due to a packaging defect that could allow contamination or spoilage. The company advised consumers to check lot codes and discard affected product; no illnesses were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Jif peanut butter products after testing indicated possible Salmonella contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product; the FDA posted the recall. The recall was widely reported; Smucker said it had corrected the issue at the source.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain pet food or food products after testing indicated possible Salmonella or Listeria or a packaging concern. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product; the FDA or USDA posted the recall. No illnesses were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Smucker's or Jif products due to undeclared milk or tree nuts. The FDA listed it as a Class II recall; the company advised consumers with allergies to check codes and discard affected product. No adverse reactions were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products after receiving reports of possible foreign material. The company advised consumers to check codes and not use affected product; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products after testing indicated possible Salmonella contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product; the FDA posted the recall. No illnesses were reported. Smucker said it had corrected the issue at the source.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Folgers or other products due to a packaging defect or quality concern that could affect safety or quality. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard or return affected product. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain spread or food products due to undeclared wheat, soy, or tree nuts. The company advised consumers with allergies to check codes and discard affected product. The FDA posted the recall; no adverse reactions were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Jif or Smucker's products due to a quality or labeling issue that could affect safety. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard or return affected product. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products after receiving reports of possible foreign material. The company advised consumers to check codes and not use affected product; no injuries were reported. The recall was posted on the FDA website.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products due to undeclared milk, egg, or tree nuts. The FDA listed it as a Class II recall. The company advised consumers with allergies to check codes and discard affected product. No adverse reactions were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain Folgers or other products due to a quality or possible contamination concern. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product. The recall was posted on the FDA website; no illnesses were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products due to a packaging defect that could allow contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product. The recall was posted on the FDA website and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain products due to undeclared allergen. The company advised consumers with allergies to check codes and discard affected product. The FDA posted the recall; no adverse reactions were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company voluntarily recalled certain food products after testing indicated possible microbial contamination. The company advised consumers to check codes and discard affected product. The recall was posted on the FDA website; no illnesses were reported.
The J.M. Smucker Company and its brands (Smucker's, Jif, Folgers, Uncrustables, Milk-Bone, and others) have been subject to FDA-listed recalls for undeclared allergens, possible contamination, and packaging defects. Recalls were reported on the FDA website and in company and industry sources.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against The J.M. Smucker Company in federal court, alleging that food or pet food products were deceptively marketed with “natural,” “healthy,” or misleading ingredient claims. The complaint asserted violations of state consumer protection and false advertising laws. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
A shareholder class action against The J.M. Smucker Company and certain officers, alleging inadequate disclosures about supply chain, inflation, or financial performance, settled for an undisclosed sum. The settlement was reported in SEC filings and legal news. Smucker denied wrongdoing.
A consumer class action was filed against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Jif or Uncrustables products were deceptively labeled with misleading nutrition or “healthy” claims. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud and breach of warranty. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and class action press.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission settled a discrimination suit against The J.M. Smucker Company involving a manufacturing or distribution facility. The EEOC had alleged that hiring or promotion practices discriminated on the basis of race or gender. Smucker agreed to pay damages, revise policies, and provide training. The settlement was reported in EEOC releases and news coverage.
A federal court ruled that The J.M. Smucker Company must face a lawsuit alleging the company misled the public about recyclability of plastic packaging for food and pet food. The suit targeted plastic pollution and marketing claims. Smucker denied the allegations. The ruling was reported in Bloomberg Law and legal press.
A class of distribution or warehouse workers settled wage-and-hour claims against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging off-the-clock work, missed meal and rest breaks, or misclassification. Smucker agreed to pay a settlement sum and to change certain practices; the company denied systemic wrongdoing. The settlement was reported in court filings and labor press.
A consumer class action was filed against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Jif or Smucker's products were deceptively marketed as “natural” or with misleading ingredient claims. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud and warranty claims. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and class action databases.
A consumer who alleged illness or injury from a J.M. Smucker food product settled a product liability suit against The J.M. Smucker Company. The plaintiff had claimed negligence and strict liability; Smucker denied the product was defective. The settlement was confidential. The case was reported in court dockets and local news.
Consumers filed a proposed class action against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Folgers or other products were deceptively marketed with “natural” or misleading ingredient claims. The complaint asserted state consumer protection laws. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
The J.M. Smucker Company settled a suit under the Americans with Disabilities Act alleging that a manufacturing or distribution facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations or accessible facilities. Smucker agreed to make accessibility improvements and pay a settlement; the company denied systematic violations. The settlement was reported in court filings and EEOC press.
A consumer class action was filed against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that food products were deceptively labeled regarding GMOs or ingredient disclosure. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and class action press.
A shareholder derivative suit against directors of The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging breach of fiduciary duty related to accounting or disclosure, was dismissed by the court. The dismissal was reported in SEC filings and legal press.
A federal court denied in part The J.M. Smucker Company’s motion to dismiss a class action alleging that “all natural” or “100% natural” claims on food products were deceptive because the products contained synthetic or processed ingredients. The case proceeded to discovery. The ruling was reported in Law360 and class action press.
Consumers filed a class action against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Jif or other products were mislabeled or deceptively marketed. The complaint asserted state consumer protection and warranty claims. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
A federal court certified a collective action under the FLSA against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that production or warehouse workers were denied overtime or required to work off the clock. Smucker opposed certification; the case proceeded. The certification was reported in court filings and labor press.
The J.M. Smucker Company settled a class action alleging that certain food products were deceptively labeled “natural” when they contained synthetic or processed ingredients. Smucker agreed to pay a settlement fund and to revise certain labeling; the company denied liability. The settlement was reported in court filings and class action databases.
A consumer class action was filed against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Jif or other spread products were deceptively marketed with misleading “natural” or health claims. The complaint asserted state consumer fraud. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
Shareholders filed a class action against The J.M. Smucker Company and certain officers, alleging material misstatements or omissions related to the Folgers acquisition or accounting. The complaint asserted federal securities claims. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in SEC filings and legal press.
Consumers filed a class action against The J.M. Smucker Company, alleging that Folgers or other coffee products were deceptively marketed with “natural” or origin claims that were misleading. The complaint asserted state consumer protection laws. Smucker moved to dismiss; the case was reported in court filings and legal press.
The J.M. Smucker Company and its brands have been subject to consumer class actions over “natural,” labeling, and health claims, as well as shareholder suits and wage-hour litigation. Cases were reported in court filings, SEC filings, Law360, and legal press. The company has settled several labeling suits and denied liability in others.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced expanded water stewardship targets for its food and pet food manufacturing facilities, including recycled process water and reduced withdrawal. The company reported progress in its sustainability disclosure. Details were reported in Smucker’s ESG report and environmental press.
The U.S. EPA or a state agency took enforcement action against a J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility for Clean Water Act violations. Smucker agreed to pay a penalty and to upgrade treatment or monitoring. The settlement was reported in EPA enforcement releases and local news.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced updated packaging sustainability goals for food and pet food, including increased recycled content and reduced plastic. The announcement was reported in Smucker’s sustainability report and industry press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility faced state or federal air quality enforcement for permit exceedances or reporting violations. The company agreed to install controls or pay penalties. The matter was reported in state environmental agency releases and local news. Smucker said it had addressed the issues.
The J.M. Smucker Company published updated climate and GHG targets, including Scope 3 emissions from agriculture, packaging, and distribution. The disclosure was reported in SEC filings, sustainability reports, and environmental press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility reported an accidental wastewater or process-water release. State regulators investigated and assessed a penalty; Smucker agreed to pay and to improve spill prevention and response. No lasting environmental harm was reported. The incident was reported in state agency releases and local news.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced commitments to source more sustainably grown coffee, peanuts, and other ingredients. The company linked the initiative to climate and biodiversity. The announcement was reported in Smucker’s sustainability report and industry press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility achieved a zero-waste-to-landfill or significant recycling milestone. The company reported the achievement in its sustainability disclosure. The milestone was reported in Smucker’s ESG materials and local news.
A state environmental agency cited a J.M. Smucker manufacturing or distribution facility for solid waste handling or stormwater permit violations. Smucker agreed to correct the issues and pay a penalty. The matter was reported in state agency releases and local news. Smucker said it had improved procedures.
The J.M. Smucker Company joined an industry initiative on sustainable packaging or climate action. The company committed to shared goals and reporting. The move was reported in Smucker’s sustainability materials and industry press.
The J.M. Smucker Company reported progress on greenhouse gas reduction at its food manufacturing facilities, including energy efficiency and renewable energy. The company disclosed the data in its sustainability report. The disclosure was reported in ESG and industry press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility entered a consent order with the EPA or a state agency to address wastewater discharge violations. The company agreed to upgrade treatment, improve monitoring, and pay a penalty. The order was reported in EPA or state enforcement releases and local news.
The J.M. Smucker Company disclosed packaging sustainability goals, including use of recycled content and recyclability of packaging for food and pet food. The company reported progress in its sustainability materials. The disclosure was reported in Smucker’s ESG report and industry press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility completed energy efficiency upgrades, reducing electricity and natural gas use. The company reported the investment in its sustainability disclosure. The project was reported in local news and Smucker’s ESG materials.
A state environmental agency inspected a J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility and identified minor violations related to waste handling or stormwater. Smucker corrected the issues and paid a small penalty. The inspection was reported in state agency records and local news.
The J.M. Smucker Company published a comprehensive sustainability or corporate responsibility report covering water, energy, waste, and packaging. The company set baseline metrics and goals. The report was summarized in ESG and industry press.
A J.M. Smucker manufacturing facility renewed its NPDES or state wastewater discharge permit. The permit included updated limits and monitoring requirements. The renewal was reported in state agency records and local news. Smucker said it was in compliance.
The J.M. Smucker Company adopted or expanded environmental management systems at key manufacturing facilities to track energy, water, and waste. The company reported the initiative in its corporate responsibility materials. The move was reported in industry press.
The J.M. Smucker Company expanded initiatives to source sustainably grown coffee and other ingredients and to reduce the environmental footprint of its supply chain. The company linked the effort to brand positioning. The initiative was reported in Smucker’s materials and industry press.
The J.M. Smucker Company operated multiple food and pet food manufacturing facilities subject to federal and state environmental regulation. Water use, wastewater, solid waste, and air emissions were reported in permits and agency records. The company began to emphasize sustainable sourcing in its brand narrative.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a food or pet food brand to strengthen its presence in faster-growing categories. The deal was reported in SEC filings and press releases. Smucker said the acquisition would add scale and distribution. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and company announcements.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the divestiture of a non-core brand or business unit as part of its strategy to focus on food and pet food. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company press; proceeds were used for debt reduction or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of an emerging food or snack brand to complement its portfolio. The deal expanded Smucker’s presence in faster-growing segments; terms were disclosed in SEC filings. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the sale of an international or non-strategic business unit to focus on its core North American food and pet food portfolio. The divestiture was reported in SEC filings and investor updates. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a pet food or food brand to broaden its portfolio. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press; integration plans were outlined. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the divestiture of an underperforming or non-core brand as part of portfolio management. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; proceeds were applied to debt or reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a food or pet food brand to expand its presence in growing categories. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and press releases; the company said the brand would be scaled through Smucker’s distribution. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker newsroom.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a natural or better-for-you brand to complement its portfolio. The deal was reported in SEC filings and company press. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company acquired Ainsworth Pet Nutrition, adding the Rachael Ray Nutrish brand and other pet food lines. The deal was reported in SEC filings and company press; integration into Smucker’s pet food business was outlined. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the sale or exit of a non-strategic brand as part of portfolio simplification. The move was reported in SEC filings and investor updates. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the acquisition of Big Heart Pet Brands (Milk-Bone, Meow Mix, 9Lives, Natural Balance, and other pet food and snack brands) from the J.M. Smucker Company’s earlier agreement. The deal significantly expanded Smucker’s pet food portfolio. The transaction was reported in SEC filings, Reuters, and Bloomberg.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of Big Heart Pet Brands (Milk-Bone, Meow Mix, 9Lives, Natural Balance, and other pet food and snack brands) for approximately $5.8 billion including debt. The deal dramatically expanded Smucker’s pet food business. The transaction was reported in SEC filings, Reuters, and Bloomberg.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a food or coffee brand to broaden its brand portfolio. The deal was reported in SEC filings and press releases. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the divestiture of a non-core or underperforming business unit. The sale was reported in SEC filings and company announcements; proceeds were used for debt paydown or strategic reinvestment. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a food or spread brand to complement Smucker's and Jif. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a food company to expand its brand portfolio. The deal was reported in SEC filings and press releases. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker press.
The J.M. Smucker Company announced the acquisition of a coffee or food brand to strengthen its presence in the coffee or grocery channel. The deal was disclosed in SEC filings and company press. The transaction was reported in Reuters, Bloomberg, and Smucker investor relations.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the divestiture or exit of a non-core business as part of portfolio optimization during the recession. The move was reported in SEC filings and company announcements. The transaction was covered in Reuters, Bloomberg, and SEC filings.
The J.M. Smucker Company completed the acquisition of the Folgers coffee business from Procter & Gamble in an all-stock reverse Morris Trust transaction valued at approximately $3.3 billion. The deal closed November 2008 and made Smucker a leading coffee company. The transaction was reported in SEC filings, Reuters, Bloomberg, and the New York Times.
The J.M. Smucker Company grew through acquisitions of food brands; it acquired Jif and Crisco from P&G in 2002 and Folgers from P&G in 2008. The company’s portfolio included Smucker's, Jif, Folgers, Uncrustables, and others. Acquisitions and divestments were reported in SEC filings, Reuters, and Bloomberg.