← Back to companies
$84B+ Annual net sales (fiscal 2025)
$5.2M+ U.S. federal lobbying 2024 (OpenSecrets)
65+ Brands in portfolio (P&G)
Filter:
2024–2025

P&G US lobbying ($2.79M federal, $1.25M state) and political contributions ($599,595 in 2024 cycle)

Procter & Gamble reported $2.79 million in U.S. federal lobbying in 2024 (ranked 242 of 9,200 clients) and $2.88 million in 2023. The company also reported $1.25 million in state-level lobbying across the U.S. and, in the EU Transparency Register, lobbying in the €1–1.25 million range for fiscal 2023–2024. P&G's PAC and employees gave $599,595 in the 2024 election cycle: about 58% from individuals and 42% from the organization (Good Government Fund PAC). Top federal recipients (PAC and employee contributions combined) included Kamala Harris ($110,650), Sherrod Brown ($52,774), Greg Landsman (D-Ohio, $18,291), Donald Trump ($16,805), DNC Services ($15,526), Dave McCormick ($11,210), and Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ, $10,000 from PAC). Full candidate lists are in OpenSecrets by cycle. Most funds went to candidates (84.5%), with the rest to party committees, leadership PACs, and outside groups. In 2024, 26 of 41 P&G lobbyists had previously held government jobs (revolving door). Specific bills P&G reported lobbying in 2024 include the WIPPES Act (H.R.2964, wipes "Do Not Flush" labeling) and the Humane Cosmetics Act of 2023 (H.R.5399). In 2023 it reported lobbying on the SHIP IT Act (H.R.471, trucking and supply chain). Broader lobbying issues include tariffs and trade (P&G has cited roughly $1 billion in pre-tax tariff costs by fiscal 2026), cosmetics safety and supply-chain transparency, FDA regulation of OTC drugs (e.g. Vicks, Crest), EPA rules on wipes and Safer Choice, and tensions between U.S. and EU sustainability requirements. P&G is a member of trade associations that lobby on tax and trade; critics have pointed to membership in groups such as American Fuel & Petrochemical Manufacturers despite the company's climate commitments. P&G states that it evaluates association memberships and that its positions may differ from those of associations.

Political

Sources for claims above:

2025

P&G announces 7,000 job cuts over two years (~6% of workforce)

In June 2025, Procter & Gamble announced it would cut 7,000 jobs over the next two years—about 6% of its total workforce and roughly 15% of non-manufacturing roles—primarily affecting office positions. The company cited slowing consumer spending, economic and tariff uncertainty (including an estimated $600 million pre-tax hit in fiscal 2026 from U.S. tariffs on raw materials, packaging, and finished goods from China), and geopolitical volatility. P&G also said it would exit some product categories and brands in certain markets. The restructuring was expected to cost $1–1.6 billion before taxes; executives framed it as an acceleration of existing strategy (broader roles, smaller teams, digitization and automation) rather than a new direction.

Labor
2023–2025

NLRB joint-employer case (P&G/Adecco, Huber Heights); PPE donning/doffing class actions

The NLRB pursued a joint-employer case (09-CA-333368) against P&G and Adecco regarding temporary workers at a facility in Huber Heights, Ohio, alleging violations of Section 8(a)(1) (concerted activities, retaliation, discharge, discipline). The case was filed in January 2024 and closed in January 2025 with a dismissal letter from the NLRB General Counsel. Separately, workers filed class and collective actions alleging P&G failed to pay for time spent donning and doffing mandatory PPE and safety gear: Pellegrino v. The Procter & Gamble Co. (S.D.N.Y., filed Dec. 2023) and George v. The Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company (Ohio, filed Feb. 2024). As of 2025 the Pellegrino case was in early pleading with motions to dismiss scheduled.

Labor
2020–2022

P&G PAC gave $398,999 in 2022 cycle ($366K federal, $21K state/local); 2020 cycle $363.5K to federal candidates; lobbied IRA, cosmetics, menstrual equity

In the 2022 election cycle, P&G's Good Government Fund PAC reported $398,999 in total contributions: $366,055 to federal candidates (about 45.5% to Democrats, 54% to Republicans) and $21,000 to state and local candidates. Notable PAC recipients in 2022 included Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash, $9,000), Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ, $5,000), Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif, $5,000), Steve Scalise (R-La, $5,000), Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska, $10,000), John Boozman (R-Ark, $7,500), Todd Young (R-Ind, $7,500), Marco Rubio (R-Fla, $6,500), Chuck Schumer (D-NY, $5,500), and Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio, $2,500). In the 2020 cycle, the PAC gave $363,500 to federal candidates (about 44% D, 55% R); top recipients included Frank Pallone Jr. ($10,000), David Perdue (R-Ga, $14,000), Susan Collins (R-Maine, $9,000), Steve Daines (R-Mont, $9,000), Joni Ernst (R-Iowa, $9,000), Shelley Moore Capito (R-WVa, $8,500), Thom Tillis (R-NC, $7,500), Cory Gardner (R-Colo, $6,500), Mitch McConnell (R-Ky, $5,000), and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz, $5,000). Federal lobbying in the 2020s included $3,156,674 in 2022 and $2,972,810 in 2021. P&G reported lobbying on several named bills in 2022 (117th Congress): the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (H.R.5376, 7 reports), Menstrual Equity For All Act (H.R.3614), Keeping Girls in School Act (H.R.4134, S.2276), Girls LEAD Act (H.R.1661, S.634), Women and Minorities in STEM Booster Act (H.R.4366, S.2217), Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act (H.R.959), and others including the Beijing Winter Olympics Sponsor Accountability Act and a resolution on National Domestic Violence Awareness Month. These align with P&G's consumer and diversity-related advocacy (e.g. Always, Tampax; STEM and girls' education).

Political

Sources for claims above:

2022

Teamsters protest at P&G HQ over supplier MonoSol lockout and forced overtime

Nearly 200 Teamsters Local 135 members were locked out of the MonoSol plant in LaPorte, Indiana, in December 2022 after voting to reject a contract offer and authorize a strike. MonoSol manufactures water-soluble packaging used by P&G (e.g. for detergent pods). The union protested at P&G headquarters in Cincinnati, calling on the company to pressure MonoSol to end forced overtime practices. Workers reported being required to work up to 22 mandatory extra hours per week under threat of dismissal, resulting in 60-hour work weeks. The Teamsters argued this violated P&G's Responsible Sourcing Policy, which prohibits forced labor and requires suppliers to respect the right to collective bargaining. Solidarity support from other Teamster locals raised over $50,000 for locked-out workers within 24 hours.

Labor
2015–2022

Worker death at P&G Greensboro plant; OSHA and state safety fines at Lima, Albany, Greensboro

Montrell Rudd, 49, died on May 6, 2022 at a P&G facility in Greensboro, North Carolina, when a 3,200-pound stainless-steel tote fell from a forklift and struck him on the upper mezzanine. The tote was not secured and was loaded on the end of the tines while being lifted over a guardrail. North Carolina's Department of Labor cited P&G for three serious safety violations and assessed a $34,502 penalty (improper lifting, unsafe operation of powered industrial trucks, unstable load). In other years, P&G Manufacturing was fined $7,000 for a serious violation at its Lima, Ohio facility (March 2015), and P&G Paper Products was fined $13,653 for serious violations at its Albany, Georgia sanitary paper products plant (March 2021).

Labor
2019

P&G spent $3.54M on federal lobbying in 2019; lobbied cosmetics safety, pandemic preparedness, OTC reform

P&G reported $3,542,330 in U.S. federal lobbying in 2019. Bills it reported lobbying that year (116th Congress) included the Pandemic and All-Hazards Preparedness and Advancing Innovation Act of 2019 (H.R.269, 4 reports), the Safe Cosmetics and Personal Care Products Act of 2019 (H.R.4296), the Personal Care Products Safety Act (S.726), the ALS Placebo No More Act (H.R.5480), the Further Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2020 (H.R.1865), and the Over-the-Counter Monograph Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act (H.R.5333 from the prior Congress).

Political

Sources for claims above:

2021

Class action accuses P&G Distributing and Schenker of California wage and hour violations

A class action, Hernandez v. Procter & Gamble Distributing, LLC et al., filed in May 2021, accused P&G Distributing and logistics provider Schenker of systematic California labor law violations. The complaint alleged that the companies rounded clock-in/clock-out times to the nearest quarter hour in the company's favor, resulting in unpaid hours; required employees to undergo unpaid COVID-19 temperature scans and medical screenings (3–6 minutes per shift) before shifts; and violated overtime pay, meal and rest break, and wage statement requirements. The suit sought to represent affected workers in California.

Labor
2020–2023

Lawsuit alleges gender-based discrimination, harassment, and constructive discharge (Elliott v. P&G)

In Elliott v. The Procter & Gamble U.S. Business Services Co. (2023), plaintiff Raymond Scott Elliott brought a Title VII claim alleging gender-based discrimination, harassment, retaliation, and constructive discharge. After his sexual orientation was disclosed to coworkers and managers in January 2020, Elliott alleged he endured verbal and physical harassment for about 18 months, causing medically significant physical and emotional harm and forcing him into early retirement. He also asserted a claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress. In a separate matter, the Supreme Court later declined to hear a former P&G employee's gender bias case after an appeals court found the employee had not shown the company's stated reasons for termination were pretextual.

Labor
2018–2021

P&G supply chain accused of forced labor and human rights abuses in palm oil and pulp

P&G faced allegations of forced labor, child labor, and human rights abuses in its supply chains. Amnesty International reported that P&G and other major buyers sourced palm oil from Wilmar International in Indonesia, where children aged 8–14 were reported to carry palm fruit sacks weighing up to 25 kg and where workers lacked proper safety equipment despite pesticide use. In 2018, an RSPO complaint was filed against FGV Holdings Berhad, a major palm oil supplier with whom P&G had a 50:50 joint venture; the complaint alleged forced labor conditions among foreign workers. P&G later invested in FGV's human rights remediation and brought in the Fair Labor Association to assess progress. A Stand.earth report documented human rights abuses across P&G's pulp and palm oil supply chains in Canada, Indonesia, and Malaysia, including failures to respect Indigenous FPIC, land seizures, and alleged criminalization of land defenders. P&G's UK Modern Slavery Act statement states the company prohibits slavery and human trafficking and requires supplier due diligence and biennial audits; advocates have argued these steps have been insufficient to prevent ongoing abuses.

Labor
2018

P&G spent $2.99M on federal lobbying in 2018; lobbied tax bill, Personal Care Safety, OTC reform, tariffs, First Step Act; PAC gave $358,710 to federal candidates

P&G reported $2,998,114 in U.S. federal lobbying in 2018. Bills it reported lobbying that year (115th Congress) included the fiscal 2018 budget reconciliation (H.R.1, 8 reports—Tax Cuts and Jobs Act), the Personal Care Products Safety Act (S.1113, 8 reports), the Over-the-Counter Drug Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act (S.2315, 6 reports) and OTC Monograph Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act of 2018 (H.R.5333, 5 reports), the BROWSER Act (H.R.2520, data privacy), the Fairness in Class Action Litigation and Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act (H.R.985), the First Step Act (S.756), the STRONGER Patents Act (S.1390, H.R.5340), the Miscellaneous Tariff Bill Act of 2018 (H.R.4318), and the Women's Entrepreneurship and Economic Empowerment Act of 2018 (H.R.5480, S.3247). In the 2018 election cycle, the PAC gave $358,710 to federal candidates (about 48% to Democrats, 49% to Republicans). Top recipients included Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ, $10,000), Paul Ryan (R-Wis, $10,000), Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif, $10,000), Angus King (I-Maine, $10,000), Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio, $8,000), Bob Casey (D-Pa, $8,000), Joe Manchin (D-WVa, $8,000), Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn, $7,500), and Claire McCaskill (D-Mo, $6,000).

Political

Sources for claims above:

2017

P&G spent $3.27M on federal lobbying in 2017; lobbied tax reconciliation, class action, patents, Personal Care Safety

P&G reported $3,269,033 in U.S. federal lobbying in 2017. Bills it reported lobbying that year (115th Congress) included the fiscal 2018 budget reconciliation (H.R.1, 4 reports—Tax Cuts and Jobs Act), the Fairness in Class Action Litigation and Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act (H.R.985, 4 reports), the STRONGER Patents Act of 2017 (S.1390, 3 reports), the BROWSER Act of 2017 (H.R.2520, data privacy, 3 reports), the Personal Care Products Safety Act (S.1113, 2 reports), and single-report activity on the First Step Act (S.756), SOS Act (H.R.2748), and Miscellaneous Tariff Bill (H.R.4318).

Political

Sources for claims above:

2016

P&G spent $3.21M on federal lobbying in 2016; lobbied Detergent PACS, chemical safety, cosmetics, microbeads; PAC gave $316,500 to federal candidates

P&G reported $3,209,070 in U.S. federal lobbying in 2016. Bills it reported lobbying that year (114th Congress) included the Detergent PACS Act of 2015 (S.588, 10 reports; H.R.1139, 9 reports—regulation of detergent packets), the Frank R. Lautenberg Chemical Safety for the 21st Century Act (S.697, H.R.2576), the DXM Abuse Prevention Act of 2015 (H.R.3250), the Cosmetic Modernization Amendments of 2015 (H.R.4075), the Humane Cosmetics Act (H.R.2858), the Personal Care Products Safety Act (S.1014), the Fairness in Class Action Litigation and Furthering Asbestos Claim Transparency Act (H.R.1927), the Microbead-Free Waters Act of 2015 (S.1424, H.R.1321), the Equality Act (S.1858, H.R.3185), trade and patent bills, and the American Manufacturing Competitiveness Act of 2016. In the 2016 election cycle, the PAC gave $316,500 to federal candidates (about 36% to Democrats, 64% to Republicans). Top recipients included Frank Pallone Jr. (D-NJ, $10,000), Roy Blunt (R-Mo, $10,000), Richard Burr (R-NC, $7,500), and Joyce Beatty (D-Ohio), Kevin Brady (R-Texas), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), Orrin Hatch (R-Utah), Patty Murray (D-Wash), and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) at $5,000 each.

Political

Sources for claims above:

2016

NLRB unfair labor practice case at P&G Fox River paper plant (Green Bay, Wis.)

The National Labor Relations Board pursued an unfair labor practice case against Procter & Gamble Paper Products Company at its Fox River plant in Green Bay, Wisconsin (Case 18-CA-180140). The case involved allegations of contract repudiation, bad faith bargaining, and coercive statements by the company. The Fox River facility produces paper products including P&G's consumer tissue and towel lines.

Labor
1980–1981

Racial discrimination class action (Dallas plant); NLRB finds P&G violated labor law at four plants

In Fisher v. Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (1980), a class action under Title VII alleged racial discrimination at P&G's Dallas plant, including discriminatory promotion practices, hiring, job assignments, and the classification of management and security positions as "white only." In a separate matter, the NLRB and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (1981) found that P&G had committed unfair labor practices at four plants—Port Ivory (N.Y.), Kansas City (Kan.), Dallas (Tex.), and Baltimore (Md.)—during 1976–77 contract negotiations. The company had engaged in a concerted course of conduct that prevented unions from including outside bargaining representatives on their negotiating committees when the unions sought multi-plant bargaining. The court upheld the NLRB's order and enforced it, with a limitation on one aspect of the expired Kansas City agreement.

Labor
September 2023

P&G recalls Zevo Fly, Gnat and Fruit Fly insect spray (injury/laceration hazard)

Procter & Gamble recalled about 8,600 Zevo Fly, Gnat and Fruit Fly Flying Insect Killer 3 Value Packs in coordination with the CPSC. The aerosol containers could rupture and leak, posing injury and laceration hazards. Affected units had batch code 3045D185EW3 and were sold at Kroger and Meijer nationwide from March through April 2023 for about $25. No incidents or injuries were reported. Consumers were advised to stop using the product and contact P&G for a full refund.

Recalls
April 2024

P&G recalls 8.2 million bags of Tide, Gain, Ace, and Ariel laundry detergent packets in US

Procter & Gamble recalled an estimated 8.2 million defective bags of laundry detergent packets (Tide Pods, Gain Flings, Ace Pods, Ariel Pods) distributed in the U.S. The outer packaging could split open near the zipper, exposing the pods and posing a risk of serious injury to children and others if ingested, as well as skin or eye contact. Affected products were manufactured between September 2023 and February 2024. The recall was conducted in coordination with the CPSC.

Recalls
2024–2025

Lawsuit alleges Tampax tampons contain undisclosed lead (Barton v. P&G)

Plaintiffs in Barton v. The Procter & Gamble Company alleged that Tampax Pearl and Tampax Radiant tampons contain lead at levels that exceed California's safety standards and that P&G failed to disclose the presence of lead. Independent testing was cited showing lead in the products; plaintiffs claimed exposure exceeded the state's Maximum Allowable Dose Level for reproductive toxicity. A federal judge in the Southern District of California granted plaintiffs partial leave to amend their complaint in February 2025. P&G has disputed the claims.

Lawsuits
June 2024

P&G benzene-in-aerosol multidistrict litigation settlement approved (Ohio)

Judge Michael H. Watson of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio granted final approval to a nationwide class settlement between P&G and consumers over benzene in aerosol antiperspirants, deodorants, dry shampoos, and dry conditioners (Secret, Old Spice, Pantene, Aussie, Herbal Essences, Hair Food). Class members who purchased affected products between November 4, 2015, and December 31, 2021, could receive about $3.50 cash per item or a replacement voucher. P&G also agreed to testing and limits on benzene in raw materials and finished products.

Lawsuits
December 2023

Class action alleges Metamucil contains undisclosed lead and misleading sugar claims (Pellegrino v. P&G)

Regina Pellegrino filed a class action in the Southern District of New York alleging P&G falsely markets Metamucil as healthy and safe while failing to disclose dangerous amounts of lead, and that claims for "appetite control," "healthy blood sugar," and "digestive health" for Metamucil Made with Real Sugar are misleading given added sugar content. A related case, Amado v. P&G, raised similar sugar claims in the Northern District of California. As of 2025 the case remained in pre-motion phase.

Lawsuits
2022

Oral-B Glide dental floss PFAS class action; benzene aerosol MDL consolidated

A class action filed in New York federal court alleged that Oral-B Glide dental floss contains PFAS ("forever chemicals") including PTFE and PFHxS without adequate disclosure. Separately, multidistrict litigation over benzene in P&G aerosol products (Casolari and related cases) was consolidated in the Southern District of Ohio; a settlement later received preliminary approval (October 2022) and final approval in June 2024.

Lawsuits
2021

Crest Gum & Enamel Repair false-ad suit; California wage/hour class action (Hernandez)

A class action challenged Crest Gum & Enamel Repair toothpaste claims, alleging that receding gums and enamel cannot be "repaired" as advertised and that the claims are misleading. Separately, a California class action alleged that P&G and logistics provider Schenker violated state labor law by rounding time, failing to pay minimum wage and overtime, and denying proper meal and rest breaks.

Lawsuits
2020

Class actions allege Tampax tampons mislabeled as "pure cotton" or "pure"

Consumers filed class actions alleging P&G mislabeled Tampax tampons as "pure organic cotton" or "pure" when they allegedly contained other materials or chemicals. In later proceedings a federal judge denied P&G's motion to dismiss in 2024, finding plaintiffs had standing based on alleged misrepresentation. P&G later prevailed in a separate Tampax PFAS/purity case in California (October 2024) where the court found plaintiffs' testing insufficient to prove PFAS.

Lawsuits
August 2019

P&G prevails in talc-asbestos case (Fishbain estate; New Jersey)

A New Jersey appeals court ruled against a retrial in a case in which the estate of Linda Fishbain claimed asbestos in P&G talc products (e.g. Cashmere Bouquet, Desert Flower) caused mesothelioma. The court rejected the estate's attempt to introduce vintage product samples due to failure to establish chain of custody (samples had been purchased on eBay in 2012). P&G was thus freed of the claims.

Lawsuits
2017

Align probiotic false-advertising settlement approved; Harrison v. P&G (FMLA) dismissed

After seven years of litigation, a court approved a settlement of the Align probiotic false-advertising class action: P&G agreed to pay up to about $30 million (cash refunds, research/education, and injunctive terms) and to stop using "clinically proven" for digestive health without adequate support. Class covered U.S. purchases from March 2009 through June 2016. Separately, the Southern District of Ohio granted P&G summary judgment in Harrison v. P&G Distributing, an FMLA/work-schedule case brought by a customs broker; the case was dismissed with prejudice.

Lawsuits
2016

Charmin Freshmates wipes class action stayed (Ramcharitar v. P&G)

A proposed class action in the Southern District of Ohio involving Charmin Freshmates pre-moistened wipes (plaintiffs Karla Ramcharitar, Gloria Wiltrakis, Cheryl Senko) was stayed by the court in early 2016 pending related proceedings.

Lawsuits
2015

Harrison v. P&G Distributing filed (FMLA, customs compliance)

Beth Harrison filed suit in the Southern District of Ohio alleging violations related to her work as a customs broker in P&G's U.S. Customs Compliance department (2011–2015), including disputes over work schedule and FMLA leave. P&G's motion for summary judgment was later granted and the case dismissed with prejudice in November 2017.

Lawsuits
August 2013

Sixth Circuit rejects Pampers Dry Max diaper-rash settlement

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit overturned the 2011 settlement in the Pampers Dry Max diaper-rash litigation, citing disproportionate benefits to attorneys ($2.73 million in fees) versus class members (e.g., one-box refund for customers). The settlement had provided $1,000 to each of 59 plaintiffs, funding for pediatric training, and label changes; P&G had not admitted fault and the CPSC had found no specific link between the diapers and skin problems.

Lawsuits
June 2011

P&G settles Pampers Dry Max diaper-rash lawsuit

P&G settled a lawsuit brought by 59 parents who alleged that Pampers Dry Max diapers caused severe rashes, blisters, and chemical burns. The deal included $1,000 per plaintiff, $2.73 million in attorneys' fees, $400,000 for pediatric skin-health training, label changes, removal of "Dry Max" from packaging, and website guidance on diaper rash. P&G did not admit fault; the CPSC had found no specific link between the product and skin issues. The settlement was later rejected by the Sixth Circuit in 2013.

Lawsuits
September 2010

Align probiotic false-advertising class action filed

A class action was filed alleging P&G falsely advertised Align probiotic as "clinically proven" to support digestive health without adequate scientific support. The case was settled in 2017 with P&G agreeing to pay up to about $30 million (refunds, research/education, and injunctive relief) and to refrain from "clinically proven" claims without reliable clinical data. The class covered U.S. purchases from March 2009 through June 2016.

Lawsuits
2009

Huston v. P&G (sexual harassment) affirmed for P&G; Olay Regenerist patent/trade-dress settlement

The Third Circuit affirmed summary judgment for P&G in Huston v. Procter & Gamble Paper Products. Plaintiff alleged sexual harassment and retaliation at P&G's Mehoopany plant (2004); the court found P&G responded promptly and adequately. Separately, P&G settled its patent and trade-dress suit against Fruit of the Earth over Olay Regenerist look-alike products (filed December 2007); Fruit of the Earth recognized P&G's rights and revised its products.

Lawsuits
May 2008

P&G sues Johnson & Johnson over Listerine Whitening Strips patent

P&G filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin alleging that J&J's Listerine Whitening Quick Dissolving Strips infringed P&G patents on the whitening active ingredient and delivery systems. P&G sought an injunction and damages; the case reflected competition in the at-home whitening market where Crest's share had declined.

Lawsuits
December 2007

P&G files patent and trade-dress suit over Olay Regenerist copycats

P&G sued Fruit of the Earth, Inc. for infringement of three patents and trade-dress infringement, alleging that Fruit of the Earth sold look-alike products at CVS that copied Olay Regenerist packaging and technology. The case settled in January 2009 with Fruit of the Earth recognizing P&G's rights and revising its product line.

Lawsuits
2006

McGee v. P&G Distributing (disability discrimination and retaliation)

Robert McGee, a P&G salesman from 1976 to 2000, sued for disability discrimination and retaliation. He alleged that after a manager (Guenther) mistreated him starting in 1997, his performance rating was downgraded and he developed depression and anxiety; he had complained to HR in 1998 with documentation of 19 incidents. P&G investigated and removed Guenther from supervision in April 1998. The district court granted summary judgment on most claims but allowed McGee's disability retaliation claim to proceed.

Lawsuits
October 2005

P&G–Gillette merger antitrust consent order analysis (Federal Register)

The Federal Trade Commission published an analysis of an agreement containing a consent order related to the merger of Procter & Gamble and The Gillette Company, reflecting regulatory scrutiny of the combination under antitrust law. The merger closed in 2005.

Lawsuits
September 2003

Court enjoins P&G Prilosec OTC "24-hour" heartburn relief claims

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a preliminary injunction to Johnson & Johnson–Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals in a false-advertising case against P&G. The court found that P&G's ads for Prilosec OTC were literally false in claiming one pill provided heartburn relief for 24 hours, when the product provided no relief for the first four to five hours after ingestion.

Lawsuits
June 2001

P&G settles securities class action for $49 million

Procter & Gamble agreed to pay $49 million to settle a securities class-action lawsuit stemming from the company's March 2000 earnings announcement. The settlement was subject to court approval. P&G's CEO characterized the resolution as a "business decision" and did not admit error.

Lawsuits
March 2024

P&G acquires Rolaids antacid brand

Procter & Gamble acquired the Rolaids antacid brand, adding the over-the-counter product to its Health Care segment. Terms were not disclosed. The acquisition expanded P&G's OTC digestive health offerings.

Acquisition
January 2023

P&G acquires Mielle Organics (hair care)

Procter & Gamble acquired Mielle Organics, a Black-founded hair care company known for natural and botanical-based products. The deal was part of P&G's strategy to grow in prestige and diverse beauty; Mielle continued to operate as a standalone brand with its founders remaining involved.

Acquisition
January 2022

P&G acquires Tula (probiotic skin care)

Procter & Gamble acquired Tula Life, Inc., a probiotic-powered skin care brand with approximately $150 million in 2021 sales. The acquisition expanded P&G's prestige beauty portfolio and reflected a shift toward science-backed, influencer-favorite brands.

Acquisition
November 2021

P&G recalls Old Spice and Secret aerosol antiperspirants over benzene

P&G issued a voluntary recall of specific Old Spice and Secret aerosol spray antiperspirants and Old Spice Below Deck aerosol spray products due to detection of benzene in the propellant. All lots with expiration dates through September 2023 were included (Old Spice High Endurance, Hardest Working Collection, Below Deck; Secret Powder Fresh, Fresh Collection, Outlast). Benzene is a known human carcinogen. P&G stated that daily exposure at the levels detected would not be expected to cause adverse health consequences; no adverse events had been reported. The FDA later terminated the recall after completion.

Recalls
December 2021

P&G recalls aerosol dry shampoo and dry conditioner sprays over benzene

P&G issued a voluntary recall of 32 aerosol dry shampoo and dry conditioner spray products after detecting benzene in the propellant. Affected brands included Pantene, Aussie, Herbal Essences, Waterless, Old Spice, and Hair Food. Benzene is a human carcinogen; P&G stated that daily exposure at the levels detected was not expected to cause adverse health consequences but recalled out of caution. Products were produced between January 2019 and June 2021. The FDA posted the recall.

Recalls
2021

P&G acquires OUAI Haircare and Farmacy Beauty

Procter & Gamble acquired OUAI (hair care by celebrity hairstylist Jen Atkin; closed December 2021) and Farmacy Beauty (clean, natural-inspired skin care; closed November 2021). Both deals were part of P&G's push into prestige and digitally native brands; acquired brands typically operate with relative independence under P&G's Prestige division.

Acquisition
November 2024

P&G suspends palm oil sourcing from two Indonesian mills after RAN deforestation report

Following a Rainforest Action Network investigation documenting illegal palm oil development in Indonesia's Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve (Leuser Ecosystem), P&G suspended sourcing from mills PT Global Sawit Semesta (GSS) and PT Aceh Trumon Anugerah Kita (ATAK). RAN reported that 2,609 hectares of forest had been lost since 2016 and that fresh fruit bunches from illegal plantations were supplied to those mills. Nestlé and other brands also announced investigations. RAN noted that P&G suppliers including Wilmar, Golden Agri Resources, Musim Mas, and Royal Golden Eagle had continued to source from illegal plantations despite prior restoration commitments.

Environmental
July 2023

P&G drops pledge against forest degradation, drawing green and investor criticism

P&G updated its Forest Commodities Policy and removed language from a 2021 commitment that prohibited buying wood pulp from operations that significantly harm drinking water, wildlife habitat, and other forest values. The company cited the lack of a "widely applied definition" of forest degradation (referencing FAO) and said it "simplified" the policy. Environmental groups and investors condemned the move: the NRDC and Green Century Funds called it a step backward, and critics warned it could conflict with the EU deforestation regulation. P&G is one of the world's largest pulp buyers for Charmin and Bounty.

Environmental
2023

P&G net zero pledge criticized; emissions path said to align with +3°C

NGO Planet Tracker and others argued that P&G's emissions trajectory was aligned with roughly +3°C warming by 2030, not the 1.5°C pathway recommended by the Science-Based Targets initiative. Over 97% of P&G's projected 2030 greenhouse gas footprint is Scope 3 (supply chain); critics said the company's value-chain engagement had "notable limitations" and that climate risks from carbon pricing may be understated. P&G and peers such as Colgate were called out as high emitters despite net zero pledges.

Environmental
October 2022

RAN and allies pressure P&G at shareholder meeting; major investors vote against CEO

At P&G's annual meeting, the Rainforest Action Network, Friends of the Earth, and NRDC coordinated actions in Cincinnati and in Indonesia. Major investors—including New York State Common Retirement Fund, New York City pension funds, and Norway's sovereign wealth fund—voted against CEO Jon Moeller and some board members. Over 70 Indigenous Batak community members demonstrated in North Sumatra with a banner "Indigenous Women Against Deforestation." An exempt solicitation urged shareholders to vote against the CEO and directors over unsustainable pulp (Canadian boreal) and palm oil (Leuser Ecosystem) sourcing. RAN had earlier exposed ongoing forest loss linked to P&G suppliers.

Environmental
September 2022

RAN exposes P&G's failed commitment to restore illegal palm plantations in Leuser

The Rainforest Action Network reported that P&G had not fulfilled its pledge to restore illegal palm oil plantations in Indonesia's Leuser Ecosystem (Rawa Singkil Wildlife Reserve). After RAN's 2022 investigation, P&G and suppliers had committed to restoration; by 2023, suppliers were reported to have backpedaled and the company was accused of failing to deliver on the public commitment. Deforestation in the reserve had destroyed thousands of hectares of critical rainforest and peatland habitat.

Environmental
2020–2021

P&G criticized for palm oil and pulp sourcing; upgrades no-deforestation commitment

NGOs including Greenpeace, Stand.earth, and RAN accused P&G of sourcing palm oil from suppliers linked to deforestation and peat destruction in Indonesia (including the Leuser ecosystem) and of using pulp from clearcut primary and old-growth forests in Canada for tissue brands (Charmin, Bounty). P&G announced an upgraded palm oil policy and by 2021 reported 100% RSPO-certified palm and a commitment to "No Deforestation, No Peat, No Exploitation" (NDPE). Critics said the company had been slow to deliver on restoration and traceability.

Environmental
2020

67% of P&G shareholders vote for increased action on pulp and palm oil harms

A shareholder proposal urging P&G to step up efforts to address environmental and social harms linked to its wood pulp and palm oil supply chains received support from 67% of voting shareholders. The vote reflected broad investor concern over deforestation, peat destruction, and human rights risks. Despite the mandate, NGOs and shareholders continued to push for stronger policies and accountability in subsequent years, including votes against the CEO and board over forest destruction.

Environmental
2019

Stand.earth report links P&G to old-growth clearance and rights abuses

Stand.earth's controversy report on P&G's pulp and palm oil sourcing documented ongoing ties to old-growth and primary forest clearance in Canada (for Charmin, Bounty, and other tissue) and to human rights abuses and deforestation in Indonesia. The report contrasted P&G's use of zero recycled fiber in tissue with competitors' higher recycled content and highlighted supply chain links to clearcut boreal and tropical rainforest. The findings fed into later shareholder and NGO campaigns.

Environmental
2018

P&G sets Ambition 2030 plastic and packaging goals amid criticism on waste

P&G announced "Ambition 2030" targets including 100% recyclable or reusable packaging by 2030 and a 50% reduction in virgin petroleum plastic (vs. 2017) for packaging. The company promoted ocean-plastic initiatives (e.g., Head & Shoulders bottles) and increased recycled content in European brands. Critics continued to point to the company's overall plastic footprint and slow progress relative to waste and climate goals; P&G remained a major user of single-use plastic across household and beauty categories.

Environmental
February 2014

Greenpeace links P&G palm oil to rainforest destruction; Head & Shoulders campaign

Greenpeace International published a year-long investigation finding that P&G's palm oil suppliers were destroying rainforests and peatlands in Indonesia, threatening Sumatran tigers and orangutans. P&G had bought about 462,000 tonnes of palm oil in 2013, with under 10% certified sustainable. Suppliers included BW Plantation, KLK, Bumitama, and Musim Mas; the report documented illegal fires in Riau and orangutan deaths near concessions. Greenpeace called for an immediate no-deforestation policy; over 100,000 people emailed P&G. The campaign targeted brands such as Head & Shoulders and Gillette.

Environmental
April 1996

EPA settles air pollution case with P&G Sacramento plant for $381,000

The U.S. EPA and Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Co. settled an air pollution case: P&G agreed to pay a $381,000 penalty. The agency alleged that P&G was eight years late (August 1983 until October 1991) in installing proper air pollution control equipment at its Sacramento plant to reduce methanol emissions. A 1990 emissions test showed the facility had underestimated methanol emissions by more than 900,000 pounds per year; a 1983 plant modification had increased emissions by about 325,000 pounds per year. P&G did not obtain a required permit for the control equipment until July 1995 and failed to meet reporting requirements for methanol and glycol ethers in 1989. After installing wet scrubbing technology in October 1991, methanol emissions fell by more than 95% (from over 2,500 lbs/day to under 100). Methanol is a VOC that contributes to smog and can affect lung function.

Environmental
1999

P&G Mehoopany paper plant: EPA documents groundwater contamination (RCRA)

The Procter & Gamble Paper Products facility in Mehoopany, Pennsylvania was under EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) corrective action for hazardous waste and groundwater contamination. The site had an unlined residual waste landfill operating since 1970 and had operated as an interim-status hazardous waste storage facility from 1981 to 1992. Arsenic in monitoring wells at the landfill routinely exceeded drinking water standards. In September 1999, EPA established that "Current Human Exposures Under Control" and "Migration of Contaminated Groundwater Under Control" had been achieved; the pulp mill at the facility ceased operations in 1999. Ongoing controls (cap, monitoring, leachate collection and treatment) were required. A Portsmouth, Virginia P&G manufacturing site also underwent RCRA corrective action for groundwater.

Environmental
2009

P&G releases sustainability report; added to Global 100 and corporate citizenship lists

P&G published its 11th annual sustainability report, "Designed to Matter," and raised its 2012 environmental targets. The company was added to the Global 100 list of sustainable corporations and ranked 14th on Corporate Responsibility Officer's 100 Best Corporate Citizens. It maintained membership in FTSE4Good and the Dow Jones Sustainability Index. Critics would later argue that P&G's palm and pulp supply chains lagged behind these reputational rankings and that deforestation and peat loss continued in sourcing regions.

Environmental
October 2016

P&G completes sale of 43 beauty brands to Coty for $12.5 billion

Procter & Gamble completed the sale of 43 beauty, fragrance, and hair care brands to Coty Inc. for $12.5 billion (deal announced July 2015; closed October 3, 2016). The portfolio included Wella, Clairol, Max Factor, CoverGirl, Gucci fragrance, Hugo Boss, Dolce & Gabbana fragrance, and other salon, retail hair color, cosmetics, and fine fragrance businesses. P&G retained Head & Shoulders, Herbal Essences, Aussie, Gillette, Venus, Olay, SK-II, and other core brands. P&G expected a one-time gain of $5–7 billion; Coty became the world's third-largest beauty company.

Divestment
March 2016

P&G completes sale of Duracell to Berkshire Hathaway

P&G completed the sale of its Duracell battery business to Berkshire Hathaway, announced in November 2014. The deal was structured as a stock swap: Berkshire gave P&G $4.7 billion in P&G shares it owned, and P&G infused about $1.7–1.8 billion in cash into Duracell before closing. The transaction was tax-efficient for Berkshire and aligned with P&G's strategy under CEO A.G. Lafley to focus on roughly 70–80 core brands.

Divestment
July 2015

P&G agrees to sell 43 beauty brands to Coty for $12.5 billion

P&G accepted Coty Inc.'s offer to acquire 43 beauty, fragrance, and hair care brands in a $12.5 billion reverse Morris Trust transaction. The portfolio included Wella, Clairol, Max Factor, CoverGirl, and fine fragrances (Gucci, Hugo Boss, Dolce & Gabbana, etc.). P&G expected a one-time gain of $5–7 billion and planned to return up to $70 billion to shareholders via dividends and buybacks from fiscal 2016–2019. The merger closed in October 2016.

Divestment
November 2014

P&G announces sale of Duracell to Berkshire Hathaway

P&G announced an agreement to sell its Duracell battery business to Berkshire Hathaway. The deal was valued at $4.7 billion in a stock swap (Berkshire's P&G shares for the business); P&G would inject about $1.7–1.8 billion in cash into Duracell before closing. The transaction closed in March 2016. The divestiture was part of P&G's plan to shed 80–100 slower-growing brands and focus on 70–90 core brands.

Divestment
December 2014

P&G agrees to sell Camay and Zest (international) to Unilever

P&G announced the sale of Camay (global) and Zest (outside North America and the Caribbean) to Unilever for an undisclosed sum. The deal included P&G's Talisman manufacturing facility in Mexico (about 170 employees). Combined revenue of the brands was about $225 million in fiscal 2014. Zest in the U.S., Canada, and the Caribbean had been sold to High Ridge Brands (Brynwood Partners) in January 2011. The Unilever transaction closed in the first half of 2015.

Divestment
April 2014

P&G sells Iams, Eukanuba, and Natura pet food to Mars for $2.9 billion

P&G sold the majority of its pet care business to Mars, Inc. for $2.9 billion in cash. The deal included Iams, Eukanuba, and Natura in North America, Latin America, and select other markets (about 80% of P&G Pet Care's global sales). P&G sought separate buyers for EU operations. About 1,100 P&G employees and five U.S. factories transferred to Mars. P&G exited pet food after 15 years to focus on core categories.

Divestment
April 2014

P&G sells DDF skincare to Designer Parfums

P&G sold the DDF (Doctor's Dermatologic Formula) skincare brand to Designer Parfums (Shaneel Enterprises Group). Terms were not disclosed. P&G had acquired DDF in 2007 for an estimated $50–90 million. Designer Parfums planned to expand DDF beyond its U.S. base into international markets; founder Dr. Howard Sobel took a larger role in marketing and product development under the new owner.

Divestment
2012

P&G sells Pringles to Kellogg for $2.7 billion

P&G completed the sale of its Pringles snack business to Kellogg Company for $2.7 billion. The deal was announced February 15, 2012, and closed by mid-2012. Pringles was P&G's last major food brand after the Folgers divestiture; the sale completed P&G's exit from the food sector and allowed the company to concentrate on beauty, grooming, health care, and fabric and home care.

Divestment
January 2011

P&G sells Zest brand (U.S., Canada, Caribbean) to High Ridge Brands

P&G sold the Zest bar soap and body wash brand in the United States, Canada, and the Caribbean to High Ridge Brands Co., a portfolio company of Brynwood Partners VI LP. The transaction closed January 4, 2011; terms were not disclosed. Zest had been owned by P&G since 1955. P&G later sold the international Zest business and the global Camay brand to Unilever in December 2014.

Divestment
November 2008

P&G completes sale of Folgers coffee to J.M. Smucker for ~$3.3 billion

P&G completed the sale of its Folgers coffee business to The J.M. Smucker Company in an all-stock reverse Morris Trust transaction. The deal was valued at about $2.95 billion in Smucker stock plus roughly $350 million in Folgers debt assumed by Smucker (total ~$3.3 billion). The transaction closed November 6, 2008. P&G divested Folgers because the brand's growth lagged the company's 4–6% target; Smucker already owned Jif and Crisco (acquired from P&G in 2002).

Divestment
February 2018

P&G acquires Snowberry (New Zealand skincare)

Procter & Gamble acquired New Zealand–based Snowberry, a natural, science-backed skincare company focused on anti-aging. Founded in 2007 by Soraya Hendesi, Snowberry had a plantation in New Zealand supplying key ingredients and was distributed in New Zealand, China, and the United States. The deal was reported to be worth tens of millions of dollars. Snowberry continued to be run by its existing team under P&G ownership.

Acquisition
November 2017

P&G acquires Native (direct-to-consumer deodorant)

Procter & Gamble acquired Native, a San Francisco–based direct-to-consumer deodorant brand known for aluminum-free and paraben-free products. Terms were not disclosed. The acquisition gave P&G a stronger position in digital-first personal care and natural deodorants. Founder and CEO Moiz Ali continued to lead the brand after the acquisition.

Acquisition
December 2009

P&G agrees to acquire Ambi Pur air care from Sara Lee

P&G signed a binding offer to acquire the Ambi Pur air freshener business from Sara Lee Corporation for €320 million. The acquisition would strengthen P&G's global air care position and complement Febreze. The transaction closed in July 2010.

Acquisition
July 2010

P&G completes acquisition of Ambi Pur from Sara Lee

Procter & Gamble completed the acquisition of the Ambi Pur air care business from Sara Lee Corporation for €320 million (announced December 2009). Ambi Pur strengthened P&G's position in the global air care market, particularly in Europe and Asia, and complemented the Febreze brand. Sara Lee had owned Ambi Pur since the 1980s.

Acquisition
2007

P&G acquires DDF (Doctor's Dermatologic Formula) skincare

Procter & Gamble acquired DDF, a dermatologist-founded skincare brand created by Dr. Howard Sobel, for an estimated $50–90 million. DDF expanded P&G's presence in professional and clinical skincare. P&G sold DDF to Designer Parfums in April 2014.

Acquisition
January 2005 / October 2005

P&G acquires Gillette for $57 billion

Procter & Gamble announced its largest acquisition: an all-stock merger with The Gillette Company valued at $57 billion (about $54 per share, 18% premium). The deal combined Gillette's razors, blades, Duracell batteries, Braun appliances, and Oral-B dental care with P&G's portfolio. The merger closed in October 2005, creating the world's largest consumer products company with projected revenue over $60 billion and about 140,000 employees. P&G planned to cut roughly 6,000 jobs through consolidation. Gillette's Duracell was later sold to Berkshire Hathaway in 2014–2016.

Acquisition
March 2003

P&G acquires Wella for €6.5 billion

Procter & Gamble acquired German hair-care company Wella for €6.5 billion (about $5.7–7 billion at the time)—then P&G's largest deal. The transaction included €5.4 billion in cash and €1.1 billion in debt; P&G expected annual savings of about €300 million from consolidation. Wella brought professional hair care (e.g., Sebastian), retail hair color, and fragrance licenses (Gucci, Dunhill, Rochas, Escada, Anna Sui). Wella was later sold to Coty as part of the 2015–2016 beauty divestiture.

Acquisition
June 2002

P&G completes sale of Jif and Crisco to J.M. Smucker

P&G completed the sale of Jif peanut butter and Crisco shortening and cooking oils to The J.M. Smucker Company (announced October 2001). The all-stock, tax-free deal was valued at approximately $813 million to $1 billion; P&G shareholders received one share of new Smucker stock for every 50 P&G shares and ended up owning about 53% of Smucker. The sale was part of P&G's effort to trim its food portfolio and focus on higher-growth categories.

Divestment
May 2001

P&G acquires Clairol from Bristol-Myers Squibb for $4.95 billion

Procter & Gamble agreed to acquire Clairol from Bristol-Myers Squibb for $4.95 billion in cash—then P&G's largest acquisition. The deal added hair care brands (Aussie, Infusium, Herbal Essences) and hair color (Nice 'n Easy, Natural Instincts, and others). The acquisition reinforced CEO A.G. Lafley's strategy to expand in beauty and grooming. Clairol was later sold to Coty as part of the 43-brand beauty divestiture in 2015–2016.

Acquisition
August 2013

P&G recalls Iams and Eukanuba dry pet food for potential Salmonella

Procter & Gamble voluntarily recalled specific lots of Iams and Eukanuba dry dog and cat food due to potential Salmonella contamination. The recall was announced August 14, 2013, after routine testing; more than 120 product lots were affected. Products were made during a 10-day window at a single facility and represented about 0.1% of P&G's annual pet food production. The contamination posed risks to pets and to people handling the food. No illnesses had been reported at the time of the recall. P&G sold its pet care business (Iams, Eukanuba, Natura) to Mars in April 2014.

Recalls
June 2010

P&G recalls Scope Original Mint and Peppermint mouthwash (1L) over child-resistant cap defect

Procter & Gamble, in cooperation with the CPSC, voluntarily recalled approximately 35,000 bottles of Scope Original Mint and Scope Peppermint mouthwash (1-liter size) due to malfunctioning child-resistant closures. Certain caps could be opened without squeezing the safety tabs, failing to meet Poison Prevention Packaging Act requirements. The mouthwash contains ethyl alcohol, which is toxic if ingested by children. Affected bottles had the number "4" on the bottom and were sold at drug and grocery stores nationwide and in Canada (January–June 2010, about $4). No injuries were reported. P&G offered a full refund or replacement coupon.

Recalls
December 2003

P&G recalls Pert Plus 2-in-1 dandruff shampoo (subpotent pyrithione zinc)

Procter & Gamble initiated a recall of 1,374 cases of Pert Plus 2 in 1 dandruff control shampoo plus conditioner. The product was subpotent in pyrithione zinc, the active antidandruff ingredient; FDA expects dandruff shampoos to contain 0.3–2% pyrithione zinc. Each case contained 12 bottles of 13.5 oz. The recall was reported in the Federal Register (December 2003).

Recalls
November 2004

P&G recalls ~175,000 Swiffer Sweep+Vac battery vacuums (fire hazard)

Procter & Gamble, in cooperation with the CPSC, announced a voluntary recall of approximately 175,000 Swiffer Sweep+Vac battery-operated vacuum cleaners. When left in the "on" position, the rotor could lock up and cause the unit to overheat, creating a smoke and fire hazard. P&G had received 14 reports of overheating, including one report of a fire with minor property damage; no consumer injuries were reported. The Sweep+Vac had been introduced in September 2004 and sold nationwide for about $30. Only that model was recalled; no other Swiffer products were involved. Consumers could return units for a free replacement coupon.

Recalls